Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2004-04-28 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2004-04-28 House Journal Page 3588 HB 298 The following, which was held from the April 27, 2004, calendar, with Amendment No. 3 (page 3562) moved and pending, was again before the House. CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 298(FIN) am "An Act relating to the income of and appropriations from the Alaska permanent fund under art. IX, sec. 15(b), Constitution of the State of Alaska, and making conforming amendments; relating to the determination of net income of the mental health trust fund; and providing for an effective date." Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Hawker: Add to the amendment: "Page 3, following line 21: Insert a new subsection to read: (d) If an appropriation is made under (c)(3)(A) for a fiscal year, amounts appropriated under (c)(1) and (2) of this section shall be reduced on a pro rata basis as necessary to accommodate the appropriation under (c)(3)(A) of this section." Reletter the following subsections accordingly. Representative Hawker moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Berkowitz objected. Representative Coghill placed a call of the House on the bill. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2004-04-28 House Journal Page 3589 CSHB 298(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Coghill, Fate, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Joule, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Masek, Morgan, Ogg, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Kapsner And so, Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 to Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Following "(B)": Delete all material and insert: "the amount calculated for the current dividend program under former AS 37.13.140 and 37.13.145, as those statutes read on December 31, 2003." Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 to Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Rokeberg objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 to Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 298(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 to Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Masek, Morgan, Moses, Wilson, Wolf 2004-04-28 House Journal Page 3590 Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams Excused: Kapsner And so, Amendment No. 2 to Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 to Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Seaton: Delete "$1,111" Insert $1,100" Representative Seaton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Lynn objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 to Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 298(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 to Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 35 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Coghill, Fate, Meyer, Seaton Nays: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Kapsner Rokeberg changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Gruenberg changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Cissna changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Heinze changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 3 to Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. 2004-04-28 House Journal Page 3591 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 298(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Coghill, Fate, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Williams, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Joule, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Masek, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Wolf Excused: Kapsner Fate changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was not offered. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Cissna: Page 3, line 16, following "section": Insert "to the extent permitted by law" Page 3, lines 19 - 21: Delete all material and insert: "(1) 60 percent shall be appropriated to the dividend fund established under AS 43.23.045; (2) 30 percent shall be appropriated for public education; (3) 10 percent shall be appropriated for municipal aid under AS 29.60.010 - 29.60.300." Representative Cissna moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Lynn objected. 2004-04-28 House Journal Page 3592 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 298(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Coghill, Croft, Dahlstrom, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Joule, Kookesh, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Moses, Stoltze Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Crawford, Fate, Foster, Heinze, Holm, Kerttula, Kohring, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Kapsner And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representatives Weyhrauch, Gruenberg, and Samuels: Page 6, following line 25: Insert a new section to read: "*Sec. 12 Sections 1 and 2 of this Act take effect immediately under AS 01.10.070(c). Representative Weyhrauch moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Croft objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 6 was adopted. CSHB 298(FIN) am was automatically in third reading and was read again. The question being: "Shall CSHB 298(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2004-04-28 House Journal Page 3593 CSHB 298(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 22 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Coghill, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Joule, Kerttula, Kohring, Masek, Moses, Stoltze, Wolf Excused: Kapsner And so, CSHB 298(FIN) am passed the House. Representative Coghill moved the effective date clauses. The question being: "Shall the effective date clauses be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 298(FIN) am Third Reading Effective Date Clauses Sections 11 and 12 YEAS: 34 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kerttula, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson Nays: Chenault, Cissna, Kohring, Masek, Wolf Excused: Kapsner And so, the effective date clauses were adopted. Representative Stoltze gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 298(FIN) am.